VERBAL VIOLENCE PERFORMED BY SUPPORTERS’ GROUP OF GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATES IN THE POLITICAL DISCOURSE OF JAKARTA ELECTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the verbal violence performed by supporters’ group of gubernatorial candidates in the discourse of Jakarta election 2017 in their community accounts on social media and its implications for language politeness. This research was a qualitative research with descriptive method. Analyzing data was done by content analysis method as a means to reveal, understand, and capture messages in data, and make conclusions obtained through identification and interpretation of data. The results of this study reveal that the delivery of comments by the supporters’ group in the discourse of Jakarta Gubernatorial Election 2017 was dominated by the use of sarcasm (figure of speech), combined with expressive speech acts, and bald on record strategy without further ado. The total violation of the use of politeness principle shows that verbal violence dominates the expression of comments and ‘high-potential’ comments that threaten the recipients’ face. Therefore, based on this research data, the politeness level of these selected groups is in the category of ‘impolite’.
Keywords: verbal violence, politeness, speech acts, political discourse
KEKERASAN VERBAL OLEH KOMUNITAS PENDUKUNG PASLON DALAM WACANA POLITIK PILKADA DKI JAKARTA
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kekerasan verbal oleh pendukung paslon tentang wacana Pilkada DKI Jakarta 2017 dalam akun komunitasnya di media sosial dan implikasinya terhadap kesantunan berbahasa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif. Penganalisisan data dilakukan dengan metode analisis isi (content analysis) untuk mengungkap, memahami, dan menangkap pesan dalam data, serta membuat simpulan yang diperoleh melalui identifikasi dan penafsiran data. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwapenyampaian komentar oleh pendukung paslon tentag wacana Pilkada DKI didominasi dengan penggunaan majas sarkasme, jenis tindak tutur ekspresif, dan strategi terus-terang tanpa basa-basi. Pelanggaran total terhadap penggunaan prinsip kesantunan menunjukkan bahwa kekerasan verbal mendominasi penyampaikan komentar dan pendapat ‘berpotensi tinggi’ mengancam muka lawan tutur, sehingta berdasarkan data penelitian ini kesantunan berbahasa para komunitas pendukung paslon berada pada kategori ‘tidak santun’.
Kata kunci: kekerasan verbal, kesantunan, tindak tutur, wacana politikDownloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
Open Access
Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora is a peer reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research from all area of humanities studies.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content that making research publish in this journal freely available to the public that supports a greater exchange of knowledge.
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published.
Disclaimer
No responsibility is assumed by publisher and co-publishers, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libelous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
How to Cite
References
Adek, M. (2019, January 10). Analisis perbandingan wacana kampanye hitam dan putih tentang Jokowi pada pilpres 2014 dan pergerakan wacananya. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/gwhju
Agustina. (2017). Kekerasan verbal dalam Pilkada DKI: mengungkap tingkat kesantunan masyarakat berwacana politik. Prosiding Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dalam Gamitan Masyarakat Multikultural. Padang: Jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia FBS Universitas Padang.
Anderson, J.A., Diabah, G., & Mensa, P.A. (2011). Powerful woman in powerless language: media mispresentation of African women in politics (the case of Liberia). ELSEVIER: Journal of Pragmatics. 43(10), 2509-2518.
Aryani, H. S. (2015). Panduan baku majas. EYD, peribahasa, kata baku dan kata tidak baku. Yogyakarta: Buku Pintar.
Astuti, S. I. (2013). Patologi kekerasan dalam berita telivisi: antara kontroversi dan regulasi. MIMBAR, 29(1), 41-48.
Barnes, J., & Larrivee, P. (2011). Alette Laguiller: does the mainstay of the French political far-left enjoy linguistic parity with her male counterparts. ELSEVIER: Journal of Pragmatics. 43(10), 2501-2508.
Bermudez, N. (2014). Las emociones en el discurso polÃtico. “Pathograma†del kirchnerismo. Journal of Pragmatics. 35(1), 11-43.
Brown, P & Levinson, S. (1987). Politenes: Some universal in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of pragmatics, 11(2), 131-146.
Cap, P. (2017). Studying ideological worldviews in political descourse space: critical-cognitive advances in the analysis of conflict and coercion. ELSEVIER: Journal of Pragmatics. 118(1), 17-27.
Chaer, A. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Dus, N.L., Blitvich, P.G.C., & Franch, P.B. (2011). Online polylogues an impoitness: the case of postings sent in responses to the Obama reggaeton youtube video. ELSEVIER: Journal of Pragmatics. 43(10), 2578-2593.
Endaswara. (2011). Metodologi penelitian sastra: Epistimologi, model, teori, dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: LKIS.
Erdinaya & Ardianto. (2001). Mass communication: An Introduction. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Gunarwan, A. (1994). Kesantunan negatif di kalangan dwibahasawan Indonesia-Jawa di Jakarta: kajian sosiopragmatik. Jakarta: Unika Atmajaya.
Haryatmoko. (2007). Etika Komunikasi: Manipulasi media, kekerasan, dan pornografi. Jogja: Kanisius.
Keraf, G. (2006). Diksi dan gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, G. (1986). Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nababan, P. W. J. (1987). Ilmu pragmatik: Teori dan praktek. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Peterson, M.A. (2015). Speaking ofnews: Press, democracy, and metapragmatics in a changing India. American ethnologis: Jounal of Amerivan ethnological and society. 42(4), 673-678.
Pranowo. (2009). Berbahasa Secara santun. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rahardi, R. K. (2000). Kesantunan imperatif dalam bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana.
Rahyono R. X. (2005). The wisdom of language: a pragmatic study on the profile of the post-new order era mass media language. Jurnal Makara, Sosial, Humaniora. 9(2), 46-56.
Syahrul, R. (2008). Pragmatik kesantunan berbahasa menyibak fenomena bahasa Indonesia guru dan siswa. Padang: UNP Press.
Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tarigan, H. G. (2013). Pengajaran gaya bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Worthama, S., & Locherb, M. (1999). Embedded metapragmatics and lying politicians. ELSEVIER: Journal of Pragmatics. 19(2), 109-125.
Yasmeen, R., Jabeen, & M., Akram, A. (2014). Politeness and language of Pakistani politicians. SAVAP Internasional. 3(5), 245-253.
Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik (Terj. Indah Fajar Wahyuni). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Yusri. (2015). Pelanggaran kesopanan berbahasa dalam komunikasi politik pada pemilihan gubernur Sulawesi Selatan 2013. PAROLE: Jurnal of Linguistic and Education, 5(1), 26-39.