THE IMPACT OF TRANSLATION TECHNIQUES TOWARD THE QUALITY OF TRANSLATION: A Case Study on a Social Text
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Quality of translation is one of the most important aspect in translation studies. This article aims at reporting the impact of translation techniques toward the quality of translation in term of accuracy, acceptability, and readibility. This descriptive qualitative research focused on single case. Objective data were taken from the “Asal-usul Elite Minangkabau Modern: Respons terhadap Kolonial Belanda Abad XIX/XX†and its source text “The Minangkabau Respons to Dutch Colonial Rule in the Nineteenth Centuryâ€. Then, affective data were taken from the informants. The four of the most frequent techniques which influence the quality of the translation are amplification, literal translation, establish equivalence and modulation. Moreover, the translation quality is categorized good as the score of accuracy is 3.33, acceptability 3.53, and readibility 3.55 in the range of 1-4.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
Open Access
Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora is a peer reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research from all area of humanities studies.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content that making research publish in this journal freely available to the public that supports a greater exchange of knowledge.
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published.
Disclaimer
No responsibility is assumed by publisher and co-publishers, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libelous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
How to Cite
References
Ardi, H. 2010. Analisis Teknik Penerjemahan dan Kualitas Terjemahan Buku ‘Asal-Usul Elite Minangkabau Modern: Respons terhadap Kolonial Belanda Abad XIX/XX†(Tesis tidak dipublikasikan). Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Ardi, H. 2015a. Upaya Pemertahanan dan Pemberdayaan Bahasa dan Budaya Minangkabau dalam Teknik Penerjemahan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa Ibu VIII. Denpasar: FIB Udayana.
Ardi, H. 2015b. Pengantar Teori Penerjemahan. Padang: Sukabina Press.
Baker, M. 1992. In other Word: a Course Book on Translation. London: Routledge.
Baker, M. 2011. In other Word: a Course Book on Translation (2 Ed). London: Routledge.
Brislin, R. 1976. Translation: Applications and research. New York: Gardner Press Inc.
Bussman, H. 1998. Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. (G. Trauth, & K. Kazzazi, Eds.) New York: Routledge.
Grave, E. E. 2007. Asal Usul Elite Minangkabau Modern: Respons terhadap Kolonial Belanda Abad XIX/XX. (M. Zed, Ed., M. Zed, N. Andri, Nurasni, & L. Marlina, Penerj.) Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Grave, E. E. 1984. The Minangkabau Response to Dutch Colonial Rule in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project.
Hoed, B. H. 2006. Penerjemahan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta: PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
House, J. 2001. Translation Quality Assessment: Linguistic Description versus Social Evaluation. Meta: Journal des Traducteurs / Meta: Translators' Journal , 46 (2), 243-257.
House, J. 2015. Translation Quality Assessment: Past and present. London: Routledge.
Machali, R. 2000. Pedoman Bagi Penerjemah. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Molina, L., & Albir, A. H. 2002. Translation Techniques Revisited:A Dynamic and Functionalist Approach. Meta: Journal des Traducteurs/Meta: Translators' Journal , XLVII (4), 498-512.
Nababan, M. R. 2003. Teori Menerjemah Bahasa Inggris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Nababan, M. R. 2007. Aspek Genetik, Objektif, dan Afektif dalam Penelitian Penerjemahan. Linguistika, 14 (26), 15-23.
Nababan, M. R., Nuraeni, & Sumardiono. 2012. Pengembangan Model Penilaian Kualitas Terjemahan. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 24 (1), 39-57.
Newmark, P. 1988. A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall.
Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. 1982. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional RI. 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Richard, J. C., Schmidt, R., Kendricks, H., & Kim, Y. 2002. Longman Dictionary of language teching and applied linguistics. London: Pearson Education Ltd.
Shuttleworth, M., & Cowie, M. 1997. Dictionary of Translation Studie. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.
Suryawinata, Z., & Hariyanto, S. 2016. Translation: Bahasan teori & penuntun praktis menerjemahkan (Edisi Revisi). Malang: MNC.
Toury, G. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.