EVALUASI PENULISAN ABSTRAK HASIL PENELITIAN DOSEN UNIVERSITAS LANCANG KUNING
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
THE EVALUATION OF ABSTRACT FOR RESEARCH REPORTS WRITTEN BY LECTURERS OF LANCANG KUNING UNIVERSITY
Abstract is an important part in the writing of research reports. However, not all authors to understand the elements of abstract writing research reports. This study aimed to evaluate the writing of abstract research professor at the University Lancang Kuning. The method used in this research is quantitative method to see the abstract research faculty produced between the years 2014-2015. The assessment is done by assessing the consistency of the faculty in writing to follow the provisions of abstract research based Handbook of Research and Community Services Lancang Kuning University Edition III. Results of the study will be used as the evaluation results at the same time improving the quality of faculty research Unilak. The results showed that there is still a lot abstract research reports Unilak lecturers who do not meet predetermined criteria abstract. Incompatibility is the most relevant number of words. A total of 59.38% abstracts of research reports lecturer exceed 200 words. This means there are many research reports abstract lecturer who still do not meet the criteria of the abstract that has been determined.
Keywords: Â abstract, research report, lecture, Unilak
Abstrak
Abstrak merupakan bagian penting dalam penulisan laporan penelitian. Namun, belum semua penulis memahami unsur-unsur penulisan abstrak laporan penelitian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi penulisan abstrak hasil penelitian dosen Universitas Lancang Kuning. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuantitatif dengan melihat abstrak hasil penelitian dosen yang dihasilkan antara tahun 2014-2015. Pengkajian dilakukan dengan menilai konsistensi dosen dalam mengikuti ketentuan penulisan abstrak hasil penelitian berdasarkan Buku Panduan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Lancang Kuning Edisi III. Hasil penelitian nantinya dapat dijadikan sebagai evaluasi sekaligus peningkatan mutu hasil penelitian dosen Unilak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen Unilak yang belum memenuhi kriteria abstrak yang telah ditentukan. Ketidaksesuaian terbanyak adalah terkait jumlah kata. Sebanyak 59,38% abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen melebihi 200 kata. Hal ini berarti masih banyak abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen yang masih belum memenuhi kriteria abstrak yang telah ditentukan.
Â
 Kata Kunci: Abstrak, Hasil Penelitian, Dosen, Unilak.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
Open Access
Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora is a peer reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research from all area of humanities studies.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content that making research publish in this journal freely available to the public that supports a greater exchange of knowledge.
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published.
Disclaimer
No responsibility is assumed by publisher and co-publishers, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libelous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
How to Cite
References
Feather, John dan Paul Sturges. 2003. International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. London: Routledge.
Floridi, L. 2010. Levels of abstraction and the Turing test. Kybernetes , 423-440.
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Lancang Kuning. 2014. Buku Panduan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Lancang Kuning Edisi III. Pekanbaru: Universitas Lancang Kuning.
Mortimer, M. 2007. Library Speak: a Glossary of terms in librarianship and information management. Texas: Total Recall.
Prytherch, R. 2005. Harrod’s Librarians’ Glossary and Reference Book: a directory of over 10,200 terms, organizations, projects and acronyms in the areas of information management, library science, publishing and archive management. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
Sternberg, Robert J. 2003. The Psychologist’s Companion: a Guide to scientific wrting for students and researchers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stevenson, J., & Collin, P. H. 2006. Dictionary of Information and Library Management. London: A & C Black Publisher.
Universitas Lancang Kuning. 2014. LPPM Unilak Naik Madya. Dipetik Agustus 11, 2015, dari Website Resmi Universitas Lancang Kuning: http://unilak.ac.id/web/detailberita/195
Universitas Lancang Kuning. 2015. Materi Sidang Pleno Komisi 1 Bidang Akademik. Tonggak Pencapaian Tahun 2015-2016 Menuju Unggul 2030 . Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia: Universitas Lancang kuning.