Types of Political Metaphors in the Indonesian Mass Media
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to reveal political metaphor data focused on classifying types of conceptual metaphors. The data source used is the text of political discourse in the Indonesian national mass media (kompas, antaranews, republika, detik, and waspada). Research data in the form of lingual units, both lexical and grammatical in the form of metaphors. The data collection method is used by the concept of metaphor identification procesure, while the data processing method is carried out based on conceptual metaphor analysis through three classifications, namely structural, ontological and orientational metaphors. The data analysis method uses referential methods, to show and compare references or meanings contained in the realm of source and target metaphorical speech. The study found that the types of conceptual metaphors in political discourse are identical through attempts at concretizing abstract concepts. The expression of political metaphor is a form of simplification of concepts that are correlated with human sensory experience. Ontological metaphors give a living perception of inanimate objects, both concrete and abstract. Ontological metaphors also allow units of language to present space to be filled and juxtaposed with other concepts because they have similar substances. While orientational metaphors tend to point to parts of the human body through the association of political terminology and cultural realities in society.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
Open Access
Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora is a peer reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research from all area of humanities studies.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content that making research publish in this journal freely available to the public that supports a greater exchange of knowledge.
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published.
Disclaimer
No responsibility is assumed by publisher and co-publishers, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libelous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
How to Cite
References
Black, Charteris. 2007. “Metafora dan Komunikasi Politikâ€. Jurnal metaphor and discourse journal. Vol.5, Edisi 4 (2007). Hal. 125-135.
Davidson, Donald. 1978. "What Metaphors Mean," Critical Inquiry 5 (1). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Davidson, Donald. 1979. What metaphors mean," in on metaphor, edited by S. Sacks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Deignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguisitcs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Grothe, Mardy. 2008. Never methapor I didn’t like: a comprehensive compilation.
Haula Baiq dan Nur Tajudin, 2019. “Konseptualisasi Metafora dalam Rubrik Opini Kompas: Kajian Semantik Kognitifâ€. Malang: Jurnal Retorika. Vol 12, No 1. Februari 2019.
Kinanti, Kingkin Puput dan Rachman, Anita Kurnia, 2019. “Metafora Tumbuhan dalam Peribahasa Indonesia (Kajian Semantik Kognitif)â€. Jember: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember. Vol. 4. No. 1, Februari 2019.
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2002. Methapor: a practical introduction. New York: Oxford.
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. (Edisi 2.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuesuma, Jati Mastoyo, Tri. 2007. Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jogjakarta: Caraswati books.
Lakoff, George dan Johnson, Mark. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago dan London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George. 1992. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Cambridge University Press.
Laksana, I Ketut Darma. 1994. “Majas dalam Tajuk Berita dan Artikel Telaah Pemakaiannya pada Enam Surat Kabar Ibu Kotaâ€. Tesis. Jakarta: Fakultas Sastra Univesitas Indonesia.
Mahsun, M. 2011. Metode penelitian bahasa. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Malah, Zubairu dan Taiwo, Dinyo Shadrach. 2020. “Conceptual Metaphore in President Muhammadu Buhari’s Political Rhetoricâ€. International Linguistics Research Journal. Vol. 3. No. 4 (2020), Hal 27-45.
Moleong, Lexy. J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nirmala, Deli. 2010. “Komponen Makna Ungkapan Metaforis dalam Pileg 2009 dalam Wacana Surat Kabar Pembaca di Harian Suara Merdekaâ€. Jurnal Parole. Vol. 1 Oktober 2010.
Nirmala, Deli. 2014. “Proses Kognitif dalam Ungkapan Metaforisâ€. Jurnal Parole. Vol. 4 No. 1 April 2014.
Nirmala, Deli. 2017. “Korespondensi Konseptual Antara Ranah Sumber dan Ranah Target dalam Ungkapan Metaforis di Surat Kabar Harian Suara Merdekaâ€. Semarang. Jurnal Humanika Undip. Vol. 3, No. 4. Juli 2017
Punter, David. 2007. Methapor. New York: Routledge.
Ritonga, Mara Untung. 2016. Exploration of Metaphore Used by Indonesian Legislators and Political Elites in the Indonesian Sociopolitical Domain. Inggris: Disertasi. Aston University.
Siregar, Bahren Umar, 2020. Seluk-Beluk Fungsi Bahasa; dari sekedar menyampaikan makna sampai memengaruhi pikiran, membantuk jatidiri, atau menata tindakan. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.
Siregar, Bahren Umar. 2004. Metafora Kekuasaan dan Metafora Melalui Kekuasaan: Melacak Perubahan Kemasyarakatan Melalui Perilaku Bahasa. Dalam PELBBA 17 Pertemuan Linguistik Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya Atma Jaya: Ketujuh Belas. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Hlm. 139-189.
Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa. Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Pess.
Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University.
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.
Surip dan Mulyadi. 2019. “Conseptual Metaphor in Humas Communicationâ€. Jurnal Internasional BirLE. Indonesia. Vol. 2, No. 4 Tahun 2019.
Surip dan Silvana, 2020. Metafora Konseptual Teks Berita Pilgubsu pada Harian Waspada dan Analisa. Medan. Jurnal Basastra, Vol. 9 No. 3, Hal. 271-288, Des 2020.
Surip, dkk. 2021. “New Metaphors in Mass Media : A Sematic-Study in Written Discourse. Asian EFL Journal. English Language Education (EFE) Publishing. Vol. 28 Issue No. 2.2 April 2021.
Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell.
Trckova, Dita. 2011. “Multi-Funtionality of Metaphor in Newspaper Discourseâ€. Brno Studies in English, Vol. 37, No.1, hal. 139-151 (online). DOI:10. 5817/BSE2011-1-9.